needaiforthis.Need AI For This
SponsorReelyze - See exactly why your Instagram Reels and TikToks underperform.

Agentation vs Clears (2026)

A side-by-side comparison of Agentation and Clears on pricing, features, and fit, so you can decide which is right for you.

Last updated: August 20, 2026

Quick answer

Agentation and Clears are both strong choices, but they fit different needs. Choose Agentation if you mainly need developers directing ai coding agents to fix specific ui bugs with annotated screenshots — its edge is eliminates the friction of translating visual ui feedback into written ai prompts. Choose Clears if you need autonomously executing backlog tickets into reviewed, merge-ready pull requests — its edge is transparent per-seat pricing published publicly, unlike most agentic coding competitors. Agentation starts at Commercial license required for redistribution (contact for pricing); Clears starts at $89/user/mo.

0
Agentation logo
Agentation

Turn UI annotations into instant AI coding prompts effortlessly.

0
Clears logo
Clears

Ship backlog stories to reviewed pull requests autonomously.

PricingFreemium
PricingFree trial
Starts atCommercial license required for redistribution (contact for pricing)
Starts at$89/user/mo
Free tierFree for individuals and internal use
Free tierFree trial, no credit card required
RatingNot yet rated
RatingNot yet rated
Best forDevelopers directing AI coding agents to fix specific UI bugs with annotated screenshots
Best forAutonomously executing backlog tickets into reviewed, merge-ready pull requests
Key strengthEliminates the friction of translating visual UI feedback into written AI prompts
Key strengthTransparent per-seat pricing published publicly, unlike most agentic coding competitors
Main drawbackCommercial redistribution requires a paid license, which may limit team deployments
Main drawbackPro tier is capped at 10 users, pushing larger teams into undisclosed Enterprise pricing

Features compared

Agentation

  • Click-to-annotate any UI element on a live or static interface
  • Convert visual annotations into structured prompts for AI coding agents
  • Direct compatibility with Claude Code and OpenAI Codex workflows
  • Open source codebase available on GitHub for inspection and customization

Clears

  • Agentic story-to-pull-request automation across the full SDLC
  • Org-wide context layer enabling multi-agent coordination beyond a single editor
  • Native integrations with Jira, GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, Slack, and MCP
  • SOC 2 certified with publicly available security documentation

Pros & cons

Agentation

Pros

  • Eliminates the friction of translating visual UI feedback into written AI prompts
  • Free for personal and internal use with open source transparency
  • Speeds up AI-assisted development by providing agents with precise visual context

Cons

  • Commercial redistribution requires a paid license, which may limit team deployments
  • Still an early-stage open source project with limited documentation and community support

Clears

Pros

  • Transparent per-seat pricing published publicly, unlike most agentic coding competitors
  • SOC 2 certification and public security docs simplify enterprise procurement reviews
  • Named reference customers with titled testimonials provide credible social proof

Cons

  • Pro tier is capped at 10 users, pushing larger teams into undisclosed Enterprise pricing
  • Publicly visible reference customers are concentrated in a limited regional market

The verdict

Choose Agentation if

you mainly need to developers directing ai coding agents to fix specific ui bugs with annotated screenshots. Its edge: eliminates the friction of translating visual ui feedback into written ai prompts.

Choose Clears if

you mainly need to autonomously executing backlog tickets into reviewed, merge-ready pull requests. Its edge: transparent per-seat pricing published publicly, unlike most agentic coding competitors.

Frequently asked questions

Is Agentation better than Clears?

Neither is universally better. Agentation is stronger for developers directing ai coding agents to fix specific ui bugs with annotated screenshots, with an edge in eliminates the friction of translating visual ui feedback into written ai prompts. Clears is stronger for autonomously executing backlog tickets into reviewed, merge-ready pull requests, with an edge in transparent per-seat pricing published publicly, unlike most agentic coding competitors. Pick based on your main task.

Which is cheaper, Agentation or Clears?

Agentation starts at Commercial license required for redistribution (contact for pricing) and Clears starts at $89/user/mo. Free tier: Agentation — Free for individuals and internal use; Clears — Free trial, no credit card required.

What is Agentation best for?

Agentation is best for developers directing ai coding agents to fix specific ui bugs with annotated screenshots, designers handing off visual feedback to developers using ai-assisted workflows, teams creating structured ai prompts from real interface walkthroughs without manual rewrites.

What is Clears best for?

Clears is best for autonomously executing backlog tickets into reviewed, merge-ready pull requests, scaling engineering output across an r&d department without hiring additional developers, integrating ai-driven delivery into existing jira and github workflows with no toolchain overhaul.

Do Agentation and Clears have free plans?

Agentation: Free for individuals and internal use. Clears: Free trial, no credit card required. Check each tool's pricing page for current limits, as plans change.