needaiforthis.Need AI For ThisSubmit
SponsorReelyze - know why your Reels flop, before you post

Chloe by Close vs Clay (2026)

A side-by-side comparison of Chloe by Close and Clay on pricing, features, and fit, so you can decide which is right for you.

Last updated: June 15, 2026

Quick answer

Chloe by Close and Clay are both strong choices, but they fit different needs. Choose Chloe by Close if you mainly need automatically following up with inbound leads who have not responded to initial outreach — its edge is deep native integration with close crm removes the need for third-party automation tools. Choose Clay if you need building targeted outbound lead lists enriched with firmographic and technographic data — its edge is aggregates 75+ data sources in one platform, reducing the need for multiple subscriptions. Chloe by Close starts at Included with Close CRM paid plans starting around $49/month; Clay starts at $149/month for Starter plan.

0
Chloe by Close logo
Chloe by Close

Your AI sales agent that works leads inside your CRM automatically.

0
Clay logo
Clay

Enrich prospects and build outreach lists with AI-powered data.

PricingPaid
PricingFreemium
Starts atIncluded with Close CRM paid plans starting around $49/month
Starts at$149/month for Starter plan
Free tierNo standalone free tier; available as part of Close CRM plans
Free tierFree plan with limited credits and features
RatingNot yet rated
RatingNot yet rated
Best forAutomatically following up with inbound leads who have not responded to initial outreach
Best forBuilding targeted outbound lead lists enriched with firmographic and technographic data
Key strengthDeep native integration with Close CRM removes the need for third-party automation tools
Key strengthAggregates 75+ data sources in one platform, reducing the need for multiple subscriptions
Main drawbackOnly available within the Close CRM ecosystem, limiting access for teams using other CRMs
Main drawbackPricing can become expensive as credit usage scales with larger prospect lists

Features compared

Chloe by Close

  • Autonomous lead follow-up and outreach directly inside Close CRM
  • AI-driven timing decisions to contact leads at optimal moments
  • Seamless access to full contact history and pipeline context
  • Automatic conversation handoff to human reps when a lead is ready to buy

Clay

  • Waterfall enrichment across 75+ data providers to maximize contact data coverage
  • AI-generated personalized email openers and research summaries at scale
  • Spreadsheet-style workflow builder for no-code prospecting automation
  • Deep integrations with CRMs like HubSpot and Salesforce for seamless data sync

Pros & cons

Chloe by Close

Pros

  • Deep native integration with Close CRM removes the need for third-party automation tools
  • Reduces manual repetitive outreach tasks and increases overall team capacity
  • Works around the clock to ensure no lead goes uncontacted due to timing or bandwidth

Cons

  • Only available within the Close CRM ecosystem, limiting access for teams using other CRMs
  • Pricing is tied to Close CRM subscriptions, which may not suit very small budgets

Clay

Pros

  • Aggregates 75+ data sources in one platform, reducing the need for multiple subscriptions
  • Flexible no-code workflow builder makes complex enrichment logic accessible to non-engineers
  • AI personalization features dramatically reduce the time needed to craft relevant outreach

Cons

  • Pricing can become expensive as credit usage scales with larger prospect lists
  • The learning curve for new users can be steep given the platform's extensive capabilities

The verdict

Choose Chloe by Close if

you mainly need to automatically following up with inbound leads who have not responded to initial outreach. Its edge: deep native integration with close crm removes the need for third-party automation tools.

Choose Clay if

you mainly need to building targeted outbound lead lists enriched with firmographic and technographic data. Its edge: aggregates 75+ data sources in one platform, reducing the need for multiple subscriptions.

Frequently asked questions

Is Chloe by Close better than Clay?

Neither is universally better. Chloe by Close is stronger for automatically following up with inbound leads who have not responded to initial outreach, with an edge in deep native integration with close crm removes the need for third-party automation tools. Clay is stronger for building targeted outbound lead lists enriched with firmographic and technographic data, with an edge in aggregates 75+ data sources in one platform, reducing the need for multiple subscriptions. Pick based on your main task.

Which is cheaper, Chloe by Close or Clay?

Chloe by Close starts at Included with Close CRM paid plans starting around $49/month and Clay starts at $149/month for Starter plan. Free tier: Chloe by Close — No standalone free tier; available as part of Close CRM plans; Clay — Free plan with limited credits and features.

What is Chloe by Close best for?

Chloe by Close is best for automatically following up with inbound leads who have not responded to initial outreach, re-engaging cold or stale leads sitting in the pipeline without manual rep effort, handling high volumes of early-stage lead nurturing so reps focus on warm conversations.

What is Clay best for?

Clay is best for building targeted outbound lead lists enriched with firmographic and technographic data, automating personalized cold email campaigns with ai-written intros, monitoring job changes and buying signals to trigger timely outreach.

Do Chloe by Close and Clay have free plans?

Chloe by Close: No standalone free tier; available as part of Close CRM plans. Clay: Free plan with limited credits and features. Check each tool's pricing page for current limits, as plans change.