needaiforthis.Need AI For ThisSubmit
Advertise to thousands of AI tool seekers · Sponsor this banner →

Context.dev vs Loma (2026)

A side-by-side comparison of Context.dev and Loma on pricing, features, and fit, so you can decide which is right for you.

Last updated: July 9, 2026

Quick answer

Context.dev and Loma are both strong choices, but they fit different needs. Choose Context.dev if you mainly need building ai agents that require real-time web data as context for reasoning — its edge is single api eliminates the need to maintain multiple scraping tools or services. Choose Loma if you need coordinating multiple llm-based agents that need shared knowledge to avoid conflicting outputs — its edge is completely free and open-source with no subscription or saas fees. Context.dev starts at approximately $49/month based on usage volume; Loma starts at Free.

0
Context.dev logo
Context.dev

One API to scrape, enrich, and extract web data instantly.

1
Loma logo
Loma

Give every AI agent and teammate shared memory instantly.

PricingFreemium
PricingFree
Starts atapproximately $49/month based on usage volume
Starts atFree
Free tierLimited API calls available on a free plan for testing and evaluation
Free tierFully free and open-source with no usage limits or paywalls
RatingNot yet rated
RatingNot yet rated
Best forBuilding AI agents that require real-time web data as context for reasoning
Best forCoordinating multiple LLM-based agents that need shared knowledge to avoid conflicting outputs
Key strengthSingle API eliminates the need to maintain multiple scraping tools or services
Key strengthCompletely free and open-source with no subscription or SaaS fees
Main drawbackPricing may scale quickly for very high-volume use cases making costs unpredictable
Main drawbackRequires technical expertise to self-host and maintain the infrastructure

Features compared

Context.dev

  • Unified scraping API that handles proxy rotation and bot bypass automatically
  • Structured data extraction from any public web page or source
  • Data enrichment capabilities to add context and metadata to raw results
  • Scalable infrastructure designed to support high-volume API requests without downtime

Loma

  • Self-hosted shared memory layer deployable on your own infrastructure
  • Company-wide knowledge store accessible by multiple AI agents simultaneously
  • Recallable context that persists across agent sessions and team interactions
  • Open-source codebase with full customization and integration flexibility

Pros & cons

Context.dev

Pros

  • Single API eliminates the need to maintain multiple scraping tools or services
  • Developer-friendly design reduces time-to-integration for engineering teams
  • Handles anti-bot measures and proxy rotation out of the box saving significant effort

Cons

  • Pricing may scale quickly for very high-volume use cases making costs unpredictable
  • Limited transparency around data freshness guarantees and coverage for niche or paywalled sites

Loma

Pros

  • Completely free and open-source with no subscription or SaaS fees
  • Full data privacy since everything runs on your own servers
  • Enables true multi-agent coordination with a single shared memory source

Cons

  • Requires technical expertise to self-host and maintain the infrastructure
  • No managed cloud option for teams that prefer a hands-off deployment

The verdict

Choose Context.dev if

you mainly need to building ai agents that require real-time web data as context for reasoning. Its edge: single api eliminates the need to maintain multiple scraping tools or services.

Choose Loma if

you mainly need to coordinating multiple llm-based agents that need shared knowledge to avoid conflicting outputs. Its edge: completely free and open-source with no subscription or saas fees.

Frequently asked questions

Is Context.dev better than Loma?

Neither is universally better. Context.dev is stronger for building ai agents that require real-time web data as context for reasoning, with an edge in single api eliminates the need to maintain multiple scraping tools or services. Loma is stronger for coordinating multiple llm-based agents that need shared knowledge to avoid conflicting outputs, with an edge in completely free and open-source with no subscription or saas fees. Pick based on your main task.

Which is cheaper, Context.dev or Loma?

Context.dev starts at approximately $49/month based on usage volume and Loma starts at Free. Free tier: Context.dev — Limited API calls available on a free plan for testing and evaluation; Loma — Fully free and open-source with no usage limits or paywalls.

What is Context.dev best for?

Context.dev is best for building ai agents that require real-time web data as context for reasoning, automating lead enrichment pipelines by pulling company and contact data from the web, powering competitive intelligence tools with up-to-date pricing and product information.

What is Loma best for?

Loma is best for coordinating multiple llm-based agents that need shared knowledge to avoid conflicting outputs, storing and retrieving internal company knowledge for ai-assisted workflows, building internal ai assistants that remember prior context across departments.

Do Context.dev and Loma have free plans?

Context.dev: Limited API calls available on a free plan for testing and evaluation. Loma: Fully free and open-source with no usage limits or paywalls. Check each tool's pricing page for current limits, as plans change.