needaiforthis.Need AI For ThisSubmit
SponsorReelyze - know why your Reels flop, before you post

Cursor vs Sourcegraph Cody (2026)

A side-by-side comparison of Cursor and Sourcegraph Cody on pricing, features, and fit, so you can decide which is right for you.

688
Cursor logo
Cursor

The AI-first code editor built for fast development

0
Sourcegraph Cody logo
Sourcegraph Cody

AI coding assistant that understands your entire codebase instantly.

PricingFreemium
PricingFreemium
Starts at$20/mo
Starts at$9/user/month for Pro plan
Free tierLimited completions and slow requests
Free tierFree plan available for individual developers with limited context and features
Rating★ 4.6 (870)
Rating★ 4.0 (0)
Best forBuilding features across multiple files
Best forUnderstanding large or legacy codebases by asking natural language questions
Key strengthPowerful codebase-wide AI
Key strengthDeep codebase awareness provides far more accurate suggestions than file-scoped assistants
Main drawbackBest features need a paid plan
Main drawbackFull codebase context features require a paid or enterprise plan for large-scale use

The verdict

Choose Cursor if

you mainly need to building features across multiple files. Its edge: powerful codebase-wide ai.

Choose Sourcegraph Cody if

you mainly need to understanding large or legacy codebases by asking natural language questions. Its edge: deep codebase awareness provides far more accurate suggestions than file-scoped assistants.