Loma vs Scarlett (2026)
A side-by-side comparison of Loma and Scarlett on pricing, features, and fit, so you can decide which is right for you.
Quick answer
Loma and Scarlett are both strong choices, but they fit different needs. Choose Loma if you mainly need coordinating multiple llm-based agents that need shared knowledge to avoid conflicting outputs — its edge is completely free and open-source with no subscription or saas fees. Choose Scarlett if you need automating crm updates and sales pipeline management without leaving slack — its edge is works where teams already communicate, removing the need to switch apps. Loma starts at Free; Scarlett starts at pricing on request.
Features compared
- Self-hosted shared memory layer deployable on your own infrastructure
- Company-wide knowledge store accessible by multiple AI agents simultaneously
- Recallable context that persists across agent sessions and team interactions
- Open-source codebase with full customization and integration flexibility
- Runs inside Slack and iMessage for frictionless task delegation
- Connects to 3,000+ tools including CRMs, email, and project management apps
- Maintains a persistent cloud workspace for context-aware, multi-step task execution
- Takes real actions such as sending emails, updating CRM records, and generating reports
Pros & cons
- Completely free and open-source with no subscription or SaaS fees
- Full data privacy since everything runs on your own servers
- Enables true multi-agent coordination with a single shared memory source
- Requires technical expertise to self-host and maintain the infrastructure
- No managed cloud option for teams that prefer a hands-off deployment
- Works where teams already communicate, removing the need to switch apps
- Goes beyond chat to actually complete tasks end to end
- Broad integration library makes it adaptable across many business workflows
- Pricing is not publicly listed, making it harder to evaluate cost upfront
- Relies heavily on Slack or iMessage, which may not suit all team setups
The verdict
Choose Loma if
you mainly need to coordinating multiple llm-based agents that need shared knowledge to avoid conflicting outputs. Its edge: completely free and open-source with no subscription or saas fees.
Choose Scarlett if
you mainly need to automating crm updates and sales pipeline management without leaving slack. Its edge: works where teams already communicate, removing the need to switch apps.
Frequently asked questions
Is Loma better than Scarlett?
Neither is universally better. Loma is stronger for coordinating multiple llm-based agents that need shared knowledge to avoid conflicting outputs, with an edge in completely free and open-source with no subscription or saas fees. Scarlett is stronger for automating crm updates and sales pipeline management without leaving slack, with an edge in works where teams already communicate, removing the need to switch apps. Pick based on your main task.
Which is cheaper, Loma or Scarlett?
Loma starts at Free and Scarlett starts at pricing on request. Free tier: Loma — Fully free and open-source with no usage limits or paywalls; Scarlett — No public free tier.
What is Loma best for?
Loma is best for coordinating multiple llm-based agents that need shared knowledge to avoid conflicting outputs, storing and retrieving internal company knowledge for ai-assisted workflows, building internal ai assistants that remember prior context across departments.
What is Scarlett best for?
Scarlett is best for automating crm updates and sales pipeline management without leaving slack, delegating email drafting and sending tasks to reduce inbox overload, generating and distributing reports by pulling data from multiple connected tools.
Do Loma and Scarlett have free plans?
Loma: Fully free and open-source with no usage limits or paywalls. Scarlett: No public free tier. Check each tool's pricing page for current limits, as plans change.