needaiforthis.Need AI For ThisSubmit
Advertise to thousands of AI tool seekers · Sponsor this banner →

AirJelly vs Loma (2026)

A side-by-side comparison of AirJelly and Loma on pricing, features, and fit, so you can decide which is right for you.

Last updated: July 8, 2026

Quick answer

AirJelly and Loma are both strong choices, but they fit different needs. Choose AirJelly if you mainly need automatically collecting action items from back-to-back zoom or google meet calls without taking manual notes — its edge is completely passive capture means zero friction or behavior change required from the user. Choose Loma if you need coordinating multiple llm-based agents that need shared knowledge to avoid conflicting outputs — its edge is completely free and open-source with no subscription or saas fees. AirJelly starts at Free; Loma starts at Free.

0
AirJelly logo
AirJelly

Never lose a task or follow-up across your apps again.

1
Loma logo
Loma

Give every AI agent and teammate shared memory instantly.

PricingFree
PricingFree
Starts atFree
Starts atFree
Free tierFull macOS app available as a free download with core task capture features included.
Free tierFully free and open-source with no usage limits or paywalls
RatingNot yet rated
RatingNot yet rated
Best forAutomatically collecting action items from back-to-back Zoom or Google Meet calls without taking manual notes
Best forCoordinating multiple LLM-based agents that need shared knowledge to avoid conflicting outputs
Key strengthCompletely passive capture means zero friction or behavior change required from the user
Key strengthCompletely free and open-source with no subscription or SaaS fees
Main drawbackCurrently macOS only, leaving Windows and Linux users without access
Main drawbackRequires technical expertise to self-host and maintain the infrastructure

Features compared

AirJelly

  • Always-on background screen monitoring that automatically detects tasks and follow-ups across all your apps
  • Fully local AI processing that keeps your data on your Mac without sending it to external servers
  • Cross-app task capture covering email, chat, documents, and video meetings in a single unified view
  • Passive task surfacing that works without manual input or workflow interruption

Loma

  • Self-hosted shared memory layer deployable on your own infrastructure
  • Company-wide knowledge store accessible by multiple AI agents simultaneously
  • Recallable context that persists across agent sessions and team interactions
  • Open-source codebase with full customization and integration flexibility

Pros & cons

AirJelly

Pros

  • Completely passive capture means zero friction or behavior change required from the user
  • Local-only processing provides strong privacy guarantees compared to cloud-based AI tools
  • Free to download and use, lowering the barrier to entry for solo professionals

Cons

  • Currently macOS only, leaving Windows and Linux users without access
  • As a newer tool, the accuracy of task detection may still be maturing and could miss context-dependent items

Loma

Pros

  • Completely free and open-source with no subscription or SaaS fees
  • Full data privacy since everything runs on your own servers
  • Enables true multi-agent coordination with a single shared memory source

Cons

  • Requires technical expertise to self-host and maintain the infrastructure
  • No managed cloud option for teams that prefer a hands-off deployment

The verdict

Choose AirJelly if

you mainly need to automatically collecting action items from back-to-back zoom or google meet calls without taking manual notes. Its edge: completely passive capture means zero friction or behavior change required from the user.

Choose Loma if

you mainly need to coordinating multiple llm-based agents that need shared knowledge to avoid conflicting outputs. Its edge: completely free and open-source with no subscription or saas fees.

Frequently asked questions

Is AirJelly better than Loma?

Neither is universally better. AirJelly is stronger for automatically collecting action items from back-to-back zoom or google meet calls without taking manual notes, with an edge in completely passive capture means zero friction or behavior change required from the user. Loma is stronger for coordinating multiple llm-based agents that need shared knowledge to avoid conflicting outputs, with an edge in completely free and open-source with no subscription or saas fees. Pick based on your main task.

Which is cheaper, AirJelly or Loma?

AirJelly starts at Free and Loma starts at Free. Free tier: AirJelly — Full macOS app available as a free download with core task capture features included.; Loma — Fully free and open-source with no usage limits or paywalls.

What is AirJelly best for?

AirJelly is best for automatically collecting action items from back-to-back zoom or google meet calls without taking manual notes, catching follow-up requests buried in slack threads or email chains before they are forgotten, consolidating to-dos scattered across multiple tools like notion, gmail, and messages into one place.

What is Loma best for?

Loma is best for coordinating multiple llm-based agents that need shared knowledge to avoid conflicting outputs, storing and retrieving internal company knowledge for ai-assisted workflows, building internal ai assistants that remember prior context across departments.

Do AirJelly and Loma have free plans?

AirJelly: Full macOS app available as a free download with core task capture features included.. Loma: Fully free and open-source with no usage limits or paywalls. Check each tool's pricing page for current limits, as plans change.