Boxes.dev vs Proxon (2026)
A side-by-side comparison of Boxes.dev and Proxon on pricing, features, and fit, so you can decide which is right for you.
Quick answer
Boxes.dev and Proxon are both strong choices, but they fit different needs. Choose Boxes.dev if you mainly need running claude code or codex on proprietary codebases without exposing code to third-party servers — its edge is full control over the execution environment for ai coding agents. Choose Proxon if you need auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks — its edge is provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage. Boxes.dev starts at Pricing varies based on compute usage and environment size; Proxon starts at On request.
Features compared
- Isolated cloud sandbox environments for running AI coding agents
- Native support for Claude Code and OpenAI Codex
- On-demand containerized boxes with full terminal and file system access
- Secure execution with control over data residency and environment configuration
- Automated discovery and inventory of all AI tools across an organization, including shadow AI
- Ownership assignment and policy binding per AI system
- Real-time spend tracking and budget attribution for each AI tool
- Centralized compliance and governance dashboard for IT and security teams
Pros & cons
- Full control over the execution environment for AI coding agents
- Improved security and data privacy compared to shared cloud AI IDEs
- Supports leading AI coding agents including Claude Code and Codex out of the box
- Setup and configuration may require DevOps knowledge for new users
- Costs can scale with compute usage, making it less predictable for heavy workloads
- Provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized AI tool usage
- Directly links AI tools to owners, policies, and costs for clear accountability
- Designed specifically for enterprise security and IT governance workflows
- Pricing is not publicly available, making it difficult to budget without a sales conversation
- May require significant onboarding effort to fully integrate with existing IT infrastructure
The verdict
Choose Boxes.dev if
you mainly need to running claude code or codex on proprietary codebases without exposing code to third-party servers. Its edge: full control over the execution environment for ai coding agents.
Choose Proxon if
you mainly need to auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks. Its edge: provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage.
Frequently asked questions
Is Boxes.dev better than Proxon?
Neither is universally better. Boxes.dev is stronger for running claude code or codex on proprietary codebases without exposing code to third-party servers, with an edge in full control over the execution environment for ai coding agents. Proxon is stronger for auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks, with an edge in provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage. Pick based on your main task.
Which is cheaper, Boxes.dev or Proxon?
Boxes.dev starts at Pricing varies based on compute usage and environment size and Proxon starts at On request. Free tier: Boxes.dev — Limited free tier available for individual developers; Proxon — No public free tier.
What is Boxes.dev best for?
Boxes.dev is best for running claude code or codex on proprietary codebases without exposing code to third-party servers, spinning up reproducible ai development environments for engineering teams, automating code generation and review workflows in a controlled cloud setting.
What is Proxon best for?
Proxon is best for auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks, enforcing ai usage policies and mapping each tool to a responsible owner, tracking and controlling ai-related software spend across business units.
Do Boxes.dev and Proxon have free plans?
Boxes.dev: Limited free tier available for individual developers. Proxon: No public free tier. Check each tool's pricing page for current limits, as plans change.