Deptrust vs Proxon (2026)
A side-by-side comparison of Deptrust and Proxon on pricing, features, and fit, so you can decide which is right for you.
Quick answer
Deptrust and Proxon are both strong choices, but they fit different needs. Choose Deptrust if you mainly need auditing project dependencies before a production release — its edge is completely free and open-source with no licensing restrictions. Choose Proxon if you need auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks — its edge is provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage. Deptrust starts at Free; Proxon starts at On request.
Features compared
- Dependency security analysis to detect known vulnerabilities in third-party libraries
- Trust risk scoring for packages based on community and security signals
- Open-source codebase hosted on GitHub for full transparency and customization
- Lightweight CLI-friendly design for easy integration into developer workflows
- Automated discovery and inventory of all AI tools across an organization, including shadow AI
- Ownership assignment and policy binding per AI system
- Real-time spend tracking and budget attribution for each AI tool
- Centralized compliance and governance dashboard for IT and security teams
Pros & cons
- Completely free and open-source with no licensing restrictions
- Transparent codebase that developers can inspect, fork, and contribute to
- Lightweight and easy to integrate into existing development workflows
- Limited documentation and community support compared to commercial alternatives
- As an open-source project, feature updates depend on contributor activity
- Provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized AI tool usage
- Directly links AI tools to owners, policies, and costs for clear accountability
- Designed specifically for enterprise security and IT governance workflows
- Pricing is not publicly available, making it difficult to budget without a sales conversation
- May require significant onboarding effort to fully integrate with existing IT infrastructure
The verdict
Choose Deptrust if
you mainly need to auditing project dependencies before a production release. Its edge: completely free and open-source with no licensing restrictions.
Choose Proxon if
you mainly need to auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks. Its edge: provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage.
Frequently asked questions
Is Deptrust better than Proxon?
Neither is universally better. Deptrust is stronger for auditing project dependencies before a production release, with an edge in completely free and open-source with no licensing restrictions. Proxon is stronger for auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks, with an edge in provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage. Pick based on your main task.
Which is cheaper, Deptrust or Proxon?
Deptrust starts at Free and Proxon starts at On request. Free tier: Deptrust — Fully free, open-source; Proxon — No public free tier.
What is Deptrust best for?
Deptrust is best for auditing project dependencies before a production release, identifying untrusted or high-risk packages in a legacy codebase, integrating dependency security checks into a ci/cd pipeline.
What is Proxon best for?
Proxon is best for auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks, enforcing ai usage policies and mapping each tool to a responsible owner, tracking and controlling ai-related software spend across business units.
Do Deptrust and Proxon have free plans?
Deptrust: Fully free, open-source. Proxon: No public free tier. Check each tool's pricing page for current limits, as plans change.