ditto.site vs Proxon (2026)
A side-by-side comparison of ditto.site and Proxon on pricing, features, and fit, so you can decide which is right for you.
Quick answer
ditto.site and Proxon are both strong choices, but they fit different needs. Choose ditto.site if you mainly need rapidly prototyping a new product by cloning an existing site as a starting scaffold — its edge is completely free and open source under the mit license with no usage fees. Choose Proxon if you need auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks — its edge is provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage. ditto.site starts at Free; Proxon starts at On request.
Features compared
- Clones any public website into componentized Next.js or Vite code
- Extracts design tokens, fonts, hover states, and responsive layouts
- Provides a free hosted REST API and an MCP server integration
- Fully deterministic output - same URL always produces identical code
- Automated discovery and inventory of all AI tools across an organization, including shadow AI
- Ownership assignment and policy binding per AI system
- Real-time spend tracking and budget attribution for each AI tool
- Centralized compliance and governance dashboard for IT and security teams
Pros & cons
- Completely free and open source under the MIT license with no usage fees
- Deterministic output ensures reproducible, byte-stable code across runs
- Saves significant time by eliminating blank-canvas setup for common site structures
- Cloning third-party sites without authorization raises copyright and IP concerns
- Output quality depends on how standard and accessible the target site's markup is
- Provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized AI tool usage
- Directly links AI tools to owners, policies, and costs for clear accountability
- Designed specifically for enterprise security and IT governance workflows
- Pricing is not publicly available, making it difficult to budget without a sales conversation
- May require significant onboarding effort to fully integrate with existing IT infrastructure
The verdict
Choose ditto.site if
you mainly need to rapidly prototyping a new product by cloning an existing site as a starting scaffold. Its edge: completely free and open source under the mit license with no usage fees.
Choose Proxon if
you mainly need to auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks. Its edge: provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage.
Frequently asked questions
Is ditto.site better than Proxon?
Neither is universally better. ditto.site is stronger for rapidly prototyping a new product by cloning an existing site as a starting scaffold, with an edge in completely free and open source under the mit license with no usage fees. Proxon is stronger for auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks, with an edge in provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage. Pick based on your main task.
Which is cheaper, ditto.site or Proxon?
ditto.site starts at Free and Proxon starts at On request. Free tier: ditto.site — Fully free, no limits, open source; Proxon — No public free tier.
What is ditto.site best for?
ditto.site is best for rapidly prototyping a new product by cloning an existing site as a starting scaffold, migrating a legacy website to a modern next.js or vite tech stack, giving agencies a componentized code base from a client reference site.
What is Proxon best for?
Proxon is best for auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks, enforcing ai usage policies and mapping each tool to a responsible owner, tracking and controlling ai-related software spend across business units.
Do ditto.site and Proxon have free plans?
ditto.site: Fully free, no limits, open source. Proxon: No public free tier. Check each tool's pricing page for current limits, as plans change.