Loomal vs Proxon (2026)
A side-by-side comparison of Loomal and Proxon on pricing, features, and fit, so you can decide which is right for you.
Quick answer
Loomal and Proxon are both strong choices, but they fit different needs. Choose Loomal if you mainly need monetizing a custom mcp server built for ai agent workflows — its edge is no revenue share means developers keep all earnings from their api calls. Choose Proxon if you need auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks — its edge is provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage. Loomal starts at $0.01 per API call (USDC); Proxon starts at On request.
Features compared
- List any MCP server or API in the open discovery index in about five minutes
- Per-call micropayments starting at $0.01 USDC via the x402 protocol
- Zero platform revenue cut - developers keep 100% of earnings
- Open payment-ready index for AI agents to discover and pay for APIs automatically
- Automated discovery and inventory of all AI tools across an organization, including shadow AI
- Ownership assignment and policy binding per AI system
- Real-time spend tracking and budget attribution for each AI tool
- Centralized compliance and governance dashboard for IT and security teams
Pros & cons
- No revenue share means developers keep all earnings from their API calls
- Extremely low entry price per call at $0.01 USDC encourages broad adoption
- Quick setup allows listing and monetizing an API in approximately five minutes
- USDC-only payments may not suit developers or buyers who prefer traditional fiat billing
- As a newer platform the discovery index may have limited listings and traffic initially
- Provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized AI tool usage
- Directly links AI tools to owners, policies, and costs for clear accountability
- Designed specifically for enterprise security and IT governance workflows
- Pricing is not publicly available, making it difficult to budget without a sales conversation
- May require significant onboarding effort to fully integrate with existing IT infrastructure
The verdict
Choose Loomal if
you mainly need to monetizing a custom mcp server built for ai agent workflows. Its edge: no revenue share means developers keep all earnings from their api calls.
Choose Proxon if
you mainly need to auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks. Its edge: provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage.
Frequently asked questions
Is Loomal better than Proxon?
Neither is universally better. Loomal is stronger for monetizing a custom mcp server built for ai agent workflows, with an edge in no revenue share means developers keep all earnings from their api calls. Proxon is stronger for auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks, with an edge in provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage. Pick based on your main task.
Which is cheaper, Loomal or Proxon?
Loomal starts at $0.01 per API call (USDC) and Proxon starts at On request. Free tier: Loomal — Free to list APIs and MCP servers; Proxon — No public free tier.
What is Loomal best for?
Loomal is best for monetizing a custom mcp server built for ai agent workflows, selling access to a niche data or utility api without building billing from scratch, discovering and paying for third-party apis inside an autonomous ai agent pipeline.
What is Proxon best for?
Proxon is best for auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks, enforcing ai usage policies and mapping each tool to a responsible owner, tracking and controlling ai-related software spend across business units.
Do Loomal and Proxon have free plans?
Loomal: Free to list APIs and MCP servers. Proxon: No public free tier. Check each tool's pricing page for current limits, as plans change.