needaiforthis.Need AI For ThisSubmit
Advertise to thousands of AI tool seekers · Sponsor this banner →

Proxon vs Runtime (2026)

A side-by-side comparison of Proxon and Runtime on pricing, features, and fit, so you can decide which is right for you.

Last updated: July 16, 2026

Quick answer

Proxon and Runtime are both strong choices, but they fit different needs. Choose Proxon if you mainly need auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks — its edge is provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage. Choose Runtime if you need running ai-generated scripts in a safe, isolated environment before deploying to production — its edge is sandboxed environments make ai-assisted coding safe for the entire team. Proxon starts at On request; Runtime starts at Paid plans starting around $20/month.

0
Proxon logo
Proxon

Full visibility and control over every AI tool in your organization.

0
Runtime logo
Runtime

Run sandboxed AI coding agents safely across your entire team.

PricingPaid
PricingFreemium
Starts atOn request
Starts atPaid plans starting around $20/month
Free tierNo public free tier
Free tierFree tier available with limited sandbox usage
RatingNot yet rated
RatingNot yet rated
Best forAuditing all AI applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow IT risks
Best forRunning AI-generated scripts in a safe, isolated environment before deploying to production
Key strengthProvides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized AI tool usage
Key strengthSandboxed environments make AI-assisted coding safe for the entire team
Main drawbackPricing is not publicly available, making it difficult to budget without a sales conversation
Main drawbackRelatively new platform so documentation and community resources may be limited

Features compared

Proxon

  • Automated discovery and inventory of all AI tools across an organization, including shadow AI
  • Ownership assignment and policy binding per AI system
  • Real-time spend tracking and budget attribution for each AI tool
  • Centralized compliance and governance dashboard for IT and security teams

Runtime

  • Isolated sandboxed environments for AI coding agents
  • Team-wide access so every member can run coding agents
  • Safe code execution without risk to production systems
  • Collaborative workspace for running and iterating on AI-generated code

Pros & cons

Proxon

Pros

  • Provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized AI tool usage
  • Directly links AI tools to owners, policies, and costs for clear accountability
  • Designed specifically for enterprise security and IT governance workflows

Cons

  • Pricing is not publicly available, making it difficult to budget without a sales conversation
  • May require significant onboarding effort to fully integrate with existing IT infrastructure

Runtime

Pros

  • Sandboxed environments make AI-assisted coding safe for the entire team
  • Accessible design lowers the barrier for non-engineers to use coding agents
  • Reduces risk of accidental damage to production code or infrastructure

Cons

  • Relatively new platform so documentation and community resources may be limited
  • Sandbox limitations could restrict more advanced or resource-intensive coding tasks

The verdict

Choose Proxon if

you mainly need to auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks. Its edge: provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage.

Choose Runtime if

you mainly need to running ai-generated scripts in a safe, isolated environment before deploying to production. Its edge: sandboxed environments make ai-assisted coding safe for the entire team.

Frequently asked questions

Is Proxon better than Runtime?

Neither is universally better. Proxon is stronger for auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks, with an edge in provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage. Runtime is stronger for running ai-generated scripts in a safe, isolated environment before deploying to production, with an edge in sandboxed environments make ai-assisted coding safe for the entire team. Pick based on your main task.

Which is cheaper, Proxon or Runtime?

Proxon starts at On request and Runtime starts at Paid plans starting around $20/month. Free tier: Proxon — No public free tier; Runtime — Free tier available with limited sandbox usage.

What is Proxon best for?

Proxon is best for auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks, enforcing ai usage policies and mapping each tool to a responsible owner, tracking and controlling ai-related software spend across business units.

What is Runtime best for?

Runtime is best for running ai-generated scripts in a safe, isolated environment before deploying to production, enabling non-technical team members to use coding agents without fear of breaking systems, automating repetitive development tasks across an engineering team using ai agents.

Do Proxon and Runtime have free plans?

Proxon: No public free tier. Runtime: Free tier available with limited sandbox usage. Check each tool's pricing page for current limits, as plans change.