Proxon vs Solarch (2026)
A side-by-side comparison of Proxon and Solarch on pricing, features, and fit, so you can decide which is right for you.
Quick answer
Proxon and Solarch are both strong choices, but they fit different needs. Choose Proxon if you mainly need auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks — its edge is provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage. Choose Solarch if you need visualizing microservice architectures for engineering teams — its edge is saves significant time by automating diagram creation from existing code. Proxon starts at On request; Solarch starts at $15/month.
Features compared
- Automated discovery and inventory of all AI tools across an organization, including shadow AI
- Ownership assignment and policy binding per AI system
- Real-time spend tracking and budget attribution for each AI tool
- Centralized compliance and governance dashboard for IT and security teams
- AI-generated interactive architecture diagrams from source code
- Automatic code-to-diagram synchronization to keep docs current
- Natural language querying to explore and understand system structure
- Support for multiple programming languages and project types
Pros & cons
- Provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized AI tool usage
- Directly links AI tools to owners, policies, and costs for clear accountability
- Designed specifically for enterprise security and IT governance workflows
- Pricing is not publicly available, making it difficult to budget without a sales conversation
- May require significant onboarding effort to fully integrate with existing IT infrastructure
- Saves significant time by automating diagram creation from existing code
- Reduces documentation drift by keeping diagrams in sync with code changes
- Interactive diagrams make complex systems easier to understand and communicate
- Relatively new tool with a smaller community and fewer third-party integrations than established diagramming tools
- Accuracy of AI-generated diagrams may vary depending on code complexity and structure
The verdict
Choose Proxon if
you mainly need to auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks. Its edge: provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage.
Choose Solarch if
you mainly need to visualizing microservice architectures for engineering teams. Its edge: saves significant time by automating diagram creation from existing code.
Frequently asked questions
Is Proxon better than Solarch?
Neither is universally better. Proxon is stronger for auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks, with an edge in provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage. Solarch is stronger for visualizing microservice architectures for engineering teams, with an edge in saves significant time by automating diagram creation from existing code. Pick based on your main task.
Which is cheaper, Proxon or Solarch?
Proxon starts at On request and Solarch starts at $15/month. Free tier: Proxon — No public free tier; Solarch — Free tier available with basic diagram generation.
What is Proxon best for?
Proxon is best for auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks, enforcing ai usage policies and mapping each tool to a responsible owner, tracking and controlling ai-related software spend across business units.
What is Solarch best for?
Solarch is best for visualizing microservice architectures for engineering teams, onboarding new developers by providing instant visual system overviews, planning and communicating system refactors before implementation.
Do Proxon and Solarch have free plans?
Proxon: No public free tier. Solarch: Free tier available with basic diagram generation. Check each tool's pricing page for current limits, as plans change.