needaiforthis.Need AI For ThisSubmit
SponsorReelyze - See exactly why your Instagram Reels and TikToks underperform.

Proxon vs Zro (2026)

A side-by-side comparison of Proxon and Zro on pricing, features, and fit, so you can decide which is right for you.

Last updated: July 30, 2026

Quick answer

Proxon and Zro are both strong choices, but they fit different needs. Choose Proxon if you mainly need auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks — its edge is provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage. Choose Zro if you need building ai coding agents that require privacy guarantees and long-context model support — its edge is strong privacy guarantees with zero request retention and no prompt training. Proxon starts at On request; Zro starts at $20/mo (includes $60 inference spend).

0
Proxon logo
Proxon

Full visibility and control over every AI tool in your organization.

0
Zro logo
Zro

Private OpenAI-compatible inference for coding agents and long-context workloads.

PricingPaid
PricingPaid
Starts atOn request
Starts at$20/mo (includes $60 inference spend)
Free tierNo public free tier
Free tierNo free tier; usage packs available without subscription
RatingNot yet rated
RatingNot yet rated
Best forAuditing all AI applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow IT risks
Best forBuilding AI coding agents that require privacy guarantees and long-context model support
Key strengthProvides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized AI tool usage
Key strengthStrong privacy guarantees with zero request retention and no prompt training
Main drawbackPricing is not publicly available, making it difficult to budget without a sales conversation
Main drawbackNo free tier available, making it harder to evaluate before committing spend

Features compared

Proxon

  • Automated discovery and inventory of all AI tools across an organization, including shadow AI
  • Ownership assignment and policy binding per AI system
  • Real-time spend tracking and budget attribution for each AI tool
  • Centralized compliance and governance dashboard for IT and security teams

Zro

  • OpenAI-compatible API supporting open-weight models like MiniMax M3, GLM-5.2, and Kimi K2.7 Code
  • Zero data retention by default with no training on customer prompts
  • Multi-region hosted inference optimized for coding agents and long-context tasks
  • Optional on-premises deployment for teams with strict data residency requirements

Pros & cons

Proxon

Pros

  • Provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized AI tool usage
  • Directly links AI tools to owners, policies, and costs for clear accountability
  • Designed specifically for enterprise security and IT governance workflows

Cons

  • Pricing is not publicly available, making it difficult to budget without a sales conversation
  • May require significant onboarding effort to fully integrate with existing IT infrastructure

Zro

Pros

  • Strong privacy guarantees with zero request retention and no prompt training
  • OpenAI-compatible API makes it easy to migrate existing applications with minimal code changes
  • Supports modern open-weight models optimized for coding and long-context tasks

Cons

  • No free tier available, making it harder to evaluate before committing spend
  • Usage packs expire after 90 days, which may not suit teams with unpredictable or infrequent usage patterns

The verdict

Choose Proxon if

you mainly need to auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks. Its edge: provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage.

Choose Zro if

you mainly need to building ai coding agents that require privacy guarantees and long-context model support. Its edge: strong privacy guarantees with zero request retention and no prompt training.

Frequently asked questions

Is Proxon better than Zro?

Neither is universally better. Proxon is stronger for auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks, with an edge in provides comprehensive visibility into both approved and unauthorized ai tool usage. Zro is stronger for building ai coding agents that require privacy guarantees and long-context model support, with an edge in strong privacy guarantees with zero request retention and no prompt training. Pick based on your main task.

Which is cheaper, Proxon or Zro?

Proxon starts at On request and Zro starts at $20/mo (includes $60 inference spend). Free tier: Proxon — No public free tier; Zro — No free tier; usage packs available without subscription.

What is Proxon best for?

Proxon is best for auditing all ai applications in use across a large enterprise to identify shadow it risks, enforcing ai usage policies and mapping each tool to a responsible owner, tracking and controlling ai-related software spend across business units.

What is Zro best for?

Zro is best for building ai coding agents that require privacy guarantees and long-context model support, developing long-context document processing or summarization tools without self-hosting infrastructure, replacing shared inference platforms in compliance-sensitive enterprise environments.

Do Proxon and Zro have free plans?

Proxon: No public free tier. Zro: No free tier; usage packs available without subscription. Check each tool's pricing page for current limits, as plans change.